SFT Judgment 4A_424/2017 – Athlete X v. World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) & WSF – Violation of the parties’ right to be heard (dismissed)

By Despina Mavromati  Athlete X. v. World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) & World Squash Federation (WSF) – The Issue CAS Proceedings: Conditions for the application of the prompt admission provision in doping cases (Art. 10.6.2 – 10.6.3 WADA Code) SFT Judgment: Difference between the violation of the parties’ right to be heard (Art. 190 (2) (d) PILA)…

SFT Judgment 4A_592/2017 – Agent A. v. Football Club B. – Violation of the right to be heard / Request for legal aid before the Federal Tribunal

Agent A. v. Football Club B. – The Issue[1] By Despina Mavromati 1) The plea of violation of the right to be heard is not an end in itself – the impact on the outcome of the case must be established 2) Request for legal aid is possible in setting aside proceedings before the SFT,…

SFT Judgment 4A_318/2017 –Football Club A. v. Player B.– Arguments disregarded by the Panel must have been “regularly” raised during the procedure

By Despina Mavromati  Football Club A. v. Player B. – The Issue Before the CAS: contract of employment between a football club and a player – outstanding salaries Before the SFT: Right to be heard: arguments disregarded by the Panel must have been “regularly” raised during the procedure; violation of public policy (pacta sunt servanda, dismissed)…